![]() |
[SUGGESTION] Laser Jump - Will it Blend? - Printable Version +- Xonotic Forums (https://forums.xonotic.org) +-- Forum: Creating & Contributing (https://forums.xonotic.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=10) +--- Forum: Xonotic - Suggestion Box (https://forums.xonotic.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=20) +--- Thread: [SUGGESTION] Laser Jump - Will it Blend? (/showthread.php?tid=1162) |
RE: Laser Jump - Will it Blend? - chooksta - 11-06-2010 So far, 99.99% of posters doesn't get this point. Maybe because it's not that intuitive. ill assume im the .01 then ![]() :^ RE: Laser Jump - Will it Blend? - tZork - 11-06-2010 I cant say i read all of this thread yet (on a painfully slow line atm, took 5 mins just to load this last thred page :S) However having skimmes some of it, and ofcourse my experiance with the current and past balance, i have a possible compromize on this issue. What if the laser was given a non symetrical force profile? That is, let ir have the same, or close to, nexuiz upwards pushforce, but less in x and y. this way you still get the vertical ability so many of us love, but lower the horisontal acceleration tahts so hard to balance. RE: Laser Jump - Will it Blend? - master[mind] - 11-06-2010 (11-06-2010, 05:19 PM)tZork Wrote: I cant say i read all of this thread yet (on a painfully slow line atm, took 5 mins just to load this last thred page :S) However having skimmes some of it, and ofcourse my experiance with the current and past balance, i have a possible compromize on this issue. What if the laser was given a non symetrical force profile? That is, let ir have the same, or close to, nexuiz upwards pushforce, but less in x and y. this way you still get the vertical ability so many of us love, but lower the horisontal acceleration tahts so hard to balance. O_o...That same thought crossed my mind a few days ago, someone give this man a cookie! No seriously! That would be a great idea! ...at least, I would be satisfied. RE: Laser Jump - Will it Blend? - FruitieX - 11-07-2010 Yeah, that idea is now in balanceXonotic.cfg ![]() |