Create an account


Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Xonotic Performance Tests

#1
I decided to run some tests on some different kinds of hardware to see how it would run. I'll keep updating this post when i run more tests. All of them were ran at 1024x768 (since if defaulted to that resolution).

Config1 (Notebook on Balanced Power Plan):
Processor:
AMD Turion™ X2 Ultra Dual-Core Mobile ZM-84 (2 CPUs), ~2.3GHz
Memory:
4GB (4096MB) DDR2 800Mhz
Hard Drive:
320 GB
Video Card:
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Operating System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

Normal Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012016475.png]
Min FPS - 45
Avg FPS - 95
Max FPS - 159

High Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012016521.png]
Min FPS - 35
Avg FPS - 61
Max FPS - 79

Ultra Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012017021.png]
Min FPS - 13
Avg FPS - 26
Max FPS - 48

Config2:
Processor:
Intel® Pentium® Dual CPU E2200 @ 2.20GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory:
3GB (3072MB) RAM
Hard Drive:
500GB
Video Card:
Gigabyte GeForce 8600 GT OC 256MB GDDR3
Operating System:
Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3

Normal Preset:
[Image: xonoticnormaltest.png]
Min FPS - 79
Avg FPS - 172
Max FPS - 270

High Preset:
[Image: xonotichightest.png]
Min FPS - 52
Avg FPS - 84
Max FPS - 104

Ultra Preset:
[Image: xonoticultratest.png]
Min FPS - 40
Avg FPS - 66
Max FPS - 101

Config3:
Processor:
Intel® Pentium® D 925+ CPU 3.10GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory:
2.0GB (2048MB) RAM
Hard Drive:
80 GB
Video Card:
XFX NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra
Operating System:
Windows XP Professional (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3


Normal Preset:
[Image: xonoticnormalpreset2.png]
Min FPS - 45
Avg FPS - 119
Max FPS - 207
High Preset:
[Image: xonotichighpreset2.png]
Min FPS - 29
Avg FPS - 69
Max FPS - 97

Ultra Preset:
[Image: xonoticultrapreset2.png]
Min FPS - 20
Avg FPS - 42
Max FPS - 85

Config4 :
Processor:
AMD Athlon II™ X4 635 Quad-Core (4 CPUs), ~2.9GHz
Memory:
4GB (4096MB) DDR3 1333Mhz
Hard Drive:
1TB
Video Card:
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Operating System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

Normal Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111310.png]

Min FPS - 93
Avg FPS - 172
Max FPS - 269

High Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111331.png]

Min FPS - 76
Avg FPS - 148
Max FPS - 225

Ultra Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111372.png]

Min FPS - 18
Avg FPS - 81
Max FPS - 184

(I'll post the screens later on)

Until now i noticed something here... ATI-based cards tend to have strange FPS drops on a certain part of the timedemo (main room shooting with the hagar and final part when killing up-close with the crylik)...
(For some reason i couldn't resize config3's screenshots...)
Cheers
Reply

#2
What is the console command to fetch the fps information?
[Image: IUBFH.png]

Contact me on irc channel:
#Dietunichtguten @Quakenet
Reply

#3
(01-20-2011, 01:05 PM)Nesquick Wrote: What is the console command to fetch the fps information?

I know for Source engine games it's "cl_showfps 3" I have no idea what it is for this engine though...

I'll try and add my benchmark of my own, I have a very similar setup to the first laptop except my graphic's card is about 100$ cheaper.

I'm assuming on 64bit capable machines you used the 64bit binary but did you use the sdl executable or the non-sdl executable? (and does it matter?)
Reply

#4
(01-20-2011, 01:05 PM)Nesquick Wrote: What is the console command to fetch the fps information?

Under the Demos menu, there is a Timedemo button next to the Play button. So, select the demo, hit Timedemo, it will play though the demo and display the total frames, total time in seconds, and min/avg/max FPS.
Reply

#5
On 64-bit OSs i used the normal 64bit executable.
If you run some tests of your own i will add them as well to the first post Smile

Cheers
Reply

#6
Another test ran at a friend's (apologise the double post)

Config4 :
Processor:
AMD Athlon II™ X4 635 Quad-Core (4 CPUs), ~2.9GHz
Memory:
4GB (4096MB) DDR3 1333Mhz
Hard Drive:
1TB
Video Card:
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Operating System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

Normal Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111310.png]

Min FPS - 93
Avg FPS - 172
Max FPS - 269

High Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111331.png]

Min FPS - 76
Avg FPS - 148
Max FPS - 225

Ultra Preset:
[Image: xonoticx642011012111372.png]

Min FPS - 18
Avg FPS - 81
Max FPS - 184

Cheers
Reply

#7
Can you provide the demo? Smile Its better to compate then I think.
[Image: 21.png]
IRC (QuakeNet): #bot.xonotic | #xonotic.pickup | #xonotic | #xonotic.cup
Steam | Twitch.tv | YouTube
Movies: Mirification #1 | #2 | Mirificaption #1 | #3 | #4 | [BOT] Clan #3 | #5 | #6 | #7 | [BOT] Clan #4 | #8 | #9

Reply

#8
It's the timedemo that already comes with xonotic xD

Cheers
Reply

#9
i would like to see some tests on some really crappy machines , say minimum 256 graphix card,
single core , 1 gig ram.

then after test , the things that could be done to tweek the shit out of it to raise performance

btw thats roughly my specs :p (i has 1.2 gig of ram)

could be good for people who are on a budget and would like to still play the new game.


ill have to get around to giving my specs and nerd tweeks , but yer , i run the game , it runs fine , so people who think they cant can maybe re-try , or improve their nerd machines.

:^
Reply

#10
I'll try to bench some of my machines with xonotic soon. However, I would like to see a shorter benchmark demo included with xonotic. The current one just takes WAY too long to run on some slower machines (takes a while on fast machines too).
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Anyone tried Xonotic on a high performance android? poVoq 1 2,895 05-29-2013, 10:26 AM
Last Post: SouL
  r_fullbright 1 Cheat or Performance Command? Liquid Sin 17 17,184 11-07-2011, 03:16 AM
Last Post: divVerent

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

Forum software by © MyBB original theme © iAndrew 2016, remixed by -z-