08-31-2010, 05:25 AM
Most of you may have noticed that any thread containing the words "balance", "nexgun", "physics" … automatically converges toward a big, sometimes anarchic, discussion with many quotes and "as for me, I propose…".
Of course, these open dialogs are part of the whole community exchanges and thus are necessary.
Still, with this amount of noise on the line, I do think that it’s barely possible for a passive (= who hasn't compiled Xonotic) reader to catch:
- what were precisely the problematic aspects with nexuiz (mostly in term of balance and physics). I did write "precisely". Any statement containing: "everybody already knows the problem with balance, right?” should not be acceptable. These issues should be listed factually, synthetically and expressed with words (not c_var values).
If no one can produce this list, then… "Houston, we have a problem".
- what are the current trends to be expected in Xonotic to overcome the problems mentioned above. "current", because, of course everything is not frozen right now.
The idea is just to know/anticipate where Xonotic is going. There is a lot of expectation in Xonotic, and transparency could avoid/mitigate a possible "first impression" surprise/disappointment, by preparing everyone to play a new game with a possibly new balance and physics.
I’m quite convinced also that another benefit could be to clearly and officially stand the mainstreamed assumptions, even among active members.
Please, don’t answer me: "everything is here, just read the forum, you lazy", because:
- dedicated threads are nor all-reader oriented, nor synthetic,
- I guess that a lot of ideas are shared off-forum.
So, my suggestion is to create a read-only informative thread. This thread could be updated as new ideas are committed. It should be very concise, factual and all-users (who know Nexuiz 2.5.2) oriented.
Of course, this information should be delivered by someone belonging to the dev team AND being neutral. A mediator, in other words. He of course shouldn’t use terms like "imo" or "I like" or "I propose".
The idea is to have a snapshot of the current consensus up to now.
Of course, these open dialogs are part of the whole community exchanges and thus are necessary.
Still, with this amount of noise on the line, I do think that it’s barely possible for a passive (= who hasn't compiled Xonotic) reader to catch:
- what were precisely the problematic aspects with nexuiz (mostly in term of balance and physics). I did write "precisely". Any statement containing: "everybody already knows the problem with balance, right?” should not be acceptable. These issues should be listed factually, synthetically and expressed with words (not c_var values).
If no one can produce this list, then… "Houston, we have a problem".
- what are the current trends to be expected in Xonotic to overcome the problems mentioned above. "current", because, of course everything is not frozen right now.
The idea is just to know/anticipate where Xonotic is going. There is a lot of expectation in Xonotic, and transparency could avoid/mitigate a possible "first impression" surprise/disappointment, by preparing everyone to play a new game with a possibly new balance and physics.
I’m quite convinced also that another benefit could be to clearly and officially stand the mainstreamed assumptions, even among active members.
Please, don’t answer me: "everything is here, just read the forum, you lazy", because:
- dedicated threads are nor all-reader oriented, nor synthetic,
- I guess that a lot of ideas are shared off-forum.
So, my suggestion is to create a read-only informative thread. This thread could be updated as new ideas are committed. It should be very concise, factual and all-users (who know Nexuiz 2.5.2) oriented.
Of course, this information should be delivered by someone belonging to the dev team AND being neutral. A mediator, in other words. He of course shouldn’t use terms like "imo" or "I like" or "I propose".
The idea is to have a snapshot of the current consensus up to now.
Fat.bot.Slim