The Big Benchmark

off topic , cos im drunk , i love u guys , u bloody nerds! , god u guys are bloiody nerds <3

hahahah , i miss u guys!

t


:^ Reply

<3 Reply

hahahah , i miss u guys!

t


:^

I miss you too

come back, we can make it work

t

t

I know we can


t Reply

I'm quite happy about what happened to my system recently:

Code:

User: Halogene
System: Owl_2.0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU
GHz: 3.30 GHz
Cores: 4
RAM: 8GB
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Card: GL_RENDERER: GeForce GTX 660 Ti/PCIe/SSE2
Driver: GL_VERSION: 4.3.0 NVIDIA 325.15
OS: Arch Linux
Arch: x86_64

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 23.3133919 seconds 450.8138515 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 256 472 1048 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 23.9515340 seconds 438.8027927 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 268 461 1041 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 26.3897254 seconds 398.2610596 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 223 429 1031 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 28.0031471 seconds 375.3149588 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 209 404 991 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 30.9868349 seconds 339.1762993 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 190 366 880 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 35.3297964 seconds 297.4826091 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 161 324 783 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 48.1359191 seconds 218.3400710 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 52 260 702 (336 seconds)

Reply

I updated the HW wiki page again: http://dev.xonotic.org/projects/xonotic/...quirements

Halogene, you're now on 2nd place - notbad.jpg


Now there's also a graph, although I think I'll need to redo it with gnuplot some time...

    Reply

Thank you, thank you. The replacement for my old broken GPU (gtx 560) really gave the thing a boost. Now if I only would play some pimped graphic-stunning commercial games... Reply

The Big Benchmark
=================

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 32.4657553 seconds 323.7257202 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 195 335 689 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 32.9275566 seconds 319.1855416 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 209 332 726 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 36.4565709 seconds 288.2882216 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 166 306 704 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 38.0087669 seconds 276.5151535 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 157 295 670 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 71.5342671 seconds 146.9225928 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 104 150 219 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 132.6650751 seconds 79.2220559 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 27 102 208 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 274.5632229 seconds 38.2789796 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 15 44 135 (336 seconds)

(I'm not sure if this matters but benchmark was performed with Xonotic-high)

- t1000
- GameBeast
- AMD FX 8150 @4Ghz
- 16 gigs @1866Mhz
- EVGA GeForce GTX 660 Ti FTW+ 3GB w/Backplate
- gentoo amd64 (x86_64)
- Driver 325.15

I want to see how it fairs in Windows when I get chance. Reply

I want to see how it fairs in Windows when I get chance.

That would be interesting, as on my machine Windows performs SIGNIFICANTLY worse than linux. I recently ran a benchmark again but it was so bad results that I am convinced I must tweak something before I run that again. Reply

The Big Benchmark

Wiki updated. Acidphase, there is some info on the driver version etc. missing, could you post the benchmark logfile here? (You're supposed to do that anyway ) Reply

The Big Benchmark
=================

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 187.4965520 seconds 56.0543641 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 45 56 61 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 193.3326271 seconds 54.3622676 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 45 55 61 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 202.3674641 seconds 51.9352261 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 43 53 61 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 207.9524291 seconds 50.5404051 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 42 51 61 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 231.1410708 seconds 45.4700671 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 39 46 60 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 247.1514940 seconds 42.5245255 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 32 43 46 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 298.3997831 seconds 35.2212052 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 17 36 45 (336 seconds)

- CPU speed:
Intel® Core™ i5 CPU M 480 @ 2.67GHz
- memory size:
8Gb
- graphics card (which vendor, which model):
NVIDIA Corporation, GeForce GT 425M
- operating system (including whether it is 32bit or 64bit):
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64bit
- graphics driver version:
NVIDIA 304.116 Reply

Hi, here are the benchmark results for my desktop computer (I'll test my laptop later, when I upgrade to Xubuntu 14.04)



The Big Benchmark
=================

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 22.7583292 seconds 461.8089460 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 267 481 1060 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 22.4682140 seconds 467.7719370 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 291 489 1122 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 25.0186560 seconds 420.0865144 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 241 449 1115 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 26.2636170 seconds 400.1733647 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 225 429 1039 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 31.1769629 seconds 337.1078847 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 179 364 603 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 37.4520562 seconds 280.6254469 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 141 302 504 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 56.3507640 seconds 186.5103372 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 51 207 409 (336 seconds)


- System name: Endeavour
- CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz
- CPU speed: 3.40Ghz
- Number of CPU cores: 4 (physical)
- RAM size: 16GB
- GPU: vendor is NVIDIA Corporation, card is GeForce GTX 650/PCIe/SSE2, driver is 4.4.0 NVIDIA 331.20
- OS: Linux (Xubuntu 12.04.4)
- architecture: 64bits Reply

An other result

OMG
MED: 10510 frames 36.3448212 seconds 289.1746236 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 158 300 604 (336 seconds)
LOW
MED: 10510 frames 42.4230787 seconds 247.7425100 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 144 259 520 (336 seconds)
MED
MED: 10510 frames 46.7867467 seconds 224.6362642 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 133 239 509 (336 seconds)
NORMAL
MED: 10510 frames 50.0957470 seconds 209.7982490 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 125 223 467 (336 seconds)
HIGH
MED: 10510 frames 58.8509944 seconds 178.5866171 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 92 192 390 (336 seconds)
ULTRA
MED: 10510 frames 69.8745567 seconds 150.4124032 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 76 164 323 (336 seconds)
ULTIMATE
MED: 10510 frames 94.0367328 seconds 111.7648358 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 28 131 293 (336 seconds)

Username: Karamel
System name: karamel-desktop
CPU: Intel® Core™ i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz
GHz: 1.60GHz
Cores: 2
RAM: 1.4GB free (of 4GB)
Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Card: AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series
Driver: 4.2.11762 Compatibility Profile Context
OS: Linux
Arch: x64
Note: Graphic card Saphire Radeon HD 7750 1GB. Debian 7 (Wheezy), Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64

I'm not a CPU expert, it looks like the i3 is a 2 physical cores of twice 1.6GHz "subcores" (I have 4 entries in /proc/cpuinfo but only 2 core id and other i3 are listed as 2 cores). Reply

new rig.

CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-4570 CPU
GHz: 3.20GHz
Cores: 4
RAM: 8GB
Card: Gainward Geforce GTX 750 Ti
Driver: 335.23 WHQL
OS: Windows 7 64bit Reply

Benchmarked my MacBook Pro 8.2 today:

Code:

User: Halogene
System: McArch
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2675QM CPU
GHz: 2.20 GHz
Cores: 4
RAM: 8GB
Vendor: X.Org
Card: GL_RENDERER: Gallium 0.4 on AMD TURKS (it actually is a ATI 6750M with open source driver)
Driver: GL_VERSION: 3.0 Mesa 10.2.6
OS: Arch Linux
Arch: x86_64

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 42.2498306 seconds 248.7583936 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 129 257 391 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 42.3423079 seconds 248.2150953 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 138 258 424 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 46.7824111 seconds 224.6570825 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 133 237 391 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 49.2758662 seconds 213.2889955 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 125 225 395 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 73.6543955 seconds 142.6934526 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 66 154 256 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 119.0747976 seconds 88.2638494 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 40 95 170 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 194.1608217 seconds 54.1303849 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 23 59 120 (336 seconds)

Reply

Hi,
I created a benchmark on my older core2duo notebook, once with the nouveau driver and once with the nvidia driver.

System: Notebook

CPU: Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T5800 @ 2.00GHz

Cores: 2

RAM: 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Synchron 667 MHz (1,5 ns)

GL_VENDOR: NVIDIA Corporation

GL_RENDERER: GeForce 9200M GS

GL_VERSION: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (1:1.0.10-1ubuntu2)
GL_VERSION: Nvidia binary driver v. 331.38

OS: Xubuntu 14.04 Linux 64Bit

Nouveau driver:

The Big Benchmark
=================

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 148.8547440 seconds 70.6057444 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 35 72 98 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 187.3180249 seconds 56.1077878 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 31 57 84 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 226.8906372 seconds 46.3218762 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 19 49 79 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 458.5009792 seconds 22.9225247 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 11 24 36 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 641.8395960 seconds 16.3748078 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 9 17 23 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 1730.4821820 seconds 6.0734517 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 3 7 10 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
MED: 10510 frames 2986.2224591 seconds 3.5125763 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 2 4 7 (19 seconds)

Nvidia:

The Big Benchmark
=================

Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 77.8253200 seconds 135.0460236 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 73 138 175 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 92.3833139 seconds 113.7651331 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 65 116 157 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 106.3814650 seconds 98.7954058 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 43 104 155 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 175.9666281 seconds 59.7272342 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 29 63 91 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 279.5512140 seconds 37.5959734 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 22 38 48 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultra
MED: 10510 frames 749.3066690 seconds 14.0262998 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 6 15 23 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on ultimate
Beendet

http://www.xup.to/dl,15718204/the-big-benchmark.log.7z/ Reply

I built a $150 "gaming" rig running (L)Ubuntu, here are my results while in LXDE and with the AMD proprietary 14.9 Catalyst driver.

System: Alphacraft

CPU: AMD A4-6300 APU

GHz: 3.7 GHz, 3.9 GHz Turbo

Cores: 2

RAM: 2GB DDR3-1333 CL9 (256 MB for graphics, 1.75 GB for system)

Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.

Card: AMD Radeon HD 8370D

Driver: 4.4.12968 Compatibility Profile Context 14.201.1006.1002 (aka Catalyst 14.9)

OS: Ubuntu 14.10 w/ the latest LXDE

Arch: x64 Reply

Got another one.

System: Cheap Intel Build

CPU: Intel Celeron G1610

GHz: 2.6

Cores: 2

RAM: 4GB DDR3-1333 CL9 in dual-channel

Vendor: Intel

Card: Intel® HD Graphics

Driver: 4.0.0 - Build 10.18.10.3958

OS: Windows 8.1

Arch: x64

240/217/191/156/99/61/37 Reply

System: i5 Build

CPU: Intel Core i5-4440

GHz: 3.1, up to 3.3 w/ boost

Cores: 4

RAM: 8GB DDR3-1600 CL9 in dual-channel

Vendor: Intel

Card: Intel® HD Graphics 4600

Driver: 4.3.0 - Build 10.18.10.3960

OS: Windows 8.1

Arch: x64

371/333/312/283/165/138/99 Reply

USER: rafallus
SYSTEM: rafallus-phoenix
CPU: Celeron G530 (2 Cores, 2.4 GHz)
RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333 MHz
GPU: Intel HD2000
OS: Windows 7 x64
Driver: 9.17.10.3347 Reply

USER: halogene
SYSTEM: hparch (HP Elitebook Folio 1040)
CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-5200U CPU
RAM: 8GB
GPU: Mesa DRI Intel® HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2)
OS: Arch Linux
Driver: 3.0 Mesa 10.5.7

MED: 10510 frames 46.7705933 seconds 224.7138482 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 149 230 381 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 51.0176453 seconds 206.0071558 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 137 212 402 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 52.7566780 seconds 199.2164860 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 130 207 397 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 57.5449847 seconds 182.6397220 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 116 190 342 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 83.2027654 seconds 126.3179168 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 81 129 220 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 103.5849819 seconds 101.4625847 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 52 106 168 (336 seconds)
MED: 10510 frames 143.7283979 seconds 73.1240322 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 33 77 125 (336 seconds)

BTW: my logfile is 850MB, since it's text only I zipped it to below 7MB. But I wonder if it is normal to have that many "Attempted division by zero" messages in the log... Reply

well i have some concerns with this benchmarking design..

1: Platform (x86/x64/PPC) restrictions - only X86/X86_64/PPC?

Darkplaces/Xonotic is compatible on all linux platforms that have a gnu compiler set. including ARM/HPA/IA64/MIPS-a.

I have a RPI-2 testbed, that i run hosting testing on often. ARM7 is a rather decent platform for low-powered >30 client, dedicated server.(when compiled with optimizations)

2: Client-only design - This benchmark focuses on framerate, which is mostly GPU rendering speed by design. instead of measuring all portions of the game. (execution time, physics rendering speed, frame loss due to audio/video/texture loading/etc, gpu usage, cpu usage). Alot of those options are great at detecting ways to optimize/improve both the engine and the game.

3: non-uniform script - The script used for testing is platform dependent. but you can run batch scripts on other platforms(wine) and bash is available for windows(gnuwin/cygwin/msys). this along with the update script, would be much nicer if it was written in a non-bias manner(win/*nix/osx/bsd/hpux/solaris/etc) so that running it unattended would be much easier and capable of being ran on a cluster easily.

-----------

There my concerns... Will post my results from my platforms later. Reply

So I build a new system.
USER: edh
SYSTEM: metis
CPU: Core i5 6400
RAM: 8Gb
GPU: GTX 950 2Gb
OS: Arch Linux
Driver: NIVDIA 355.11


Big benchmark for some reason stops working when it gets to Ultra but the following results are given first:
Benchmarking on omg
MED: 10510 frames 24.0513053 seconds 436.9825206 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 266 458 1171 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on low
MED: 10510 frames 23.8759197 seconds 440.1924675 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 181 466 1235 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on med
MED: 10510 frames 25.5375133 seconds 411.5514259 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 220 439 1188 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on normal
MED: 10510 frames 26.9150207 seconds 390.4882749 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 224 418 1119 (336 seconds)
Benchmarking on high
MED: 10510 frames 28.2539935 seconds 371.9828134 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 209 397 1060 (336 seconds)

No log file as it stops working before doing the logfile dump but I will see about trying to get around this issue, do some system tweaking then rerun. I think right now I have the record for high quality! More to follow. Reply